Still hiring?
13 checksNo red flags
Browse
All Tech JobsThe whole board, newest first.Roles That Fit MeAnswer a few questions, see your matches.Early WindowFound before the big boards.Direct ApplyStraight to the manager, past the ATS.By specialty
Your materials
CV AnalyzerWhat an ATS sees, and what to fix.Tailor CVBrought in line with one posting.Cover LetterWritten from your CV and the role.You and the process
Hey, I’m Wayjo. I find roles before the big boards.
Free to browse. An account unlocks the rest.
Jobs
All Tech JobsThe whole board, newest first.Roles That Fit MeAnswer a few questions, see your matches.Early WindowFound before the big boards.Direct ApplyStraight to the manager, past the ATS.Not stated
Similar roles pay €30K - 70K a year · our estimate
The whole posting in a few lines. Sign up to read it here and on every role you open.
Sign Up to ReadThe company is hiring a Human Factors Test Engineer for its Getafe (Madrid) site, in the Integration Test & Analysis Team within the Flight & Integration Test Centre.
The team plans, prepares and runs integration tests at subsystem, system and aircraft level on programs including A330 MRTT, A400M, C295, Eurodrone, SIRTAP and the future FCAS/NGF. You would evaluate avionics and mission systems across simulators, ground test rigs and flight test campaigns.
Permanent contract, professional experience level, in the Testing job family, employed by the company Defence and Space SAU.
Hybrid working where possible, with flexible arrangements.
Equal opportunity: applications are welcome regardless of background, age, gender, disability, sexual orientation or religious belief.
Part of the week in the office
Airbus
Office in Spain
Also hiring in Lisbon, Portugal, Montreal, Canada, Canada and 22 more places
4 of their 216 open roles are remote
We've checked whether it's still hiring and how crowded it is.
Still hiring?
13 checksNo red flags
How crowded?
7 checksNo red flags
How well does this role fit you?
Answer a few questions or drop your CV, and every role gets a fit score with the reasons, this one first.
Something wrong with this vacancy?