Still hiring?
14 checksNo red flags
Browse
All Tech JobsThe whole board, newest first.Roles That Fit MeAnswer a few questions, see your matches.Early WindowFound before the big boards.Direct ApplyStraight to the manager, past the ATS.By specialty
Your materials
CV AnalyzerWhat an ATS sees, and what to fix.Tailor CVBrought in line with one posting.Cover LetterWritten from your CV and the role.You and the process
Hey, I’m Wayjo. I find roles before the big boards.
Free to browse. An account unlocks the rest.
Jobs
All Tech JobsThe whole board, newest first.Roles That Fit MeAnswer a few questions, see your matches.Early WindowFound before the big boards.Direct ApplyStraight to the manager, past the ATS.$139,200 - 174,000/ year
The whole posting in a few lines. Sign up to read it here and on every role you open.
Sign Up to ReadThe company is a global architecture, engineering and geospatial firm with over 75 offices, working on complex projects that shape communities and critical infrastructure.
You would join the mission critical project management team as a project manager, working across disciplines on complex, multidiscipline work.
Full-time position tied to the Chicago, IL, New York, NY and/or Pittsburgh, PA offices, offered in person, hybrid or remote.
Pay ranges from $139,200 to $174,000 USD.
Base pay may vary based on job-related knowledge, skills and experience.
No visa sponsorship is offered; you must already have work authorization in the country where the job is located.
The company is an equal opportunity employer and recruits and promotes without regard to protected status under applicable law.
Fully remote
No visa sponsorship
Woolpert
Also hiring in Chicago, United States, FL, United States, San Antonio, United States and 1 more place
4 of their 9 open roles are remote
We've checked whether it's still hiring and how crowded it is.
Still hiring?
14 checksNo red flags
How crowded?
7 checksNo red flags
How well does this role fit you?
Answer a few questions or drop your CV, and every role gets a fit score with the reasons, this one first.
Something wrong with this vacancy?