Still hiring?
11 checksActively hiring
In its favour3
- Still on the company's own careers site, checked 1 h agoModerate evidence
- Found in the last 48 hours, before the big job boardsModerate evidence
- Applications close on Nov 12Slight evidence
Browse
All Tech JobsThe whole board, newest first.Roles That Fit MeAnswer a few questions, see your matches.Early WindowFound before the big boards.Direct ApplyStraight to the manager, past the ATS.By specialty
Your materials
CV AnalyzerWhat an ATS sees, and what to fix.Tailor CVBrought in line with one posting.Cover LetterWritten from your CV and the role.You and the process
Hey, I’m Wayjo. I find roles before the big boards.
Free to browse. An account unlocks the rest.
Jobs
All Tech JobsThe whole board, newest first.Roles That Fit MeAnswer a few questions, see your matches.Early WindowFound before the big boards.Direct ApplyStraight to the manager, past the ATS.Not stated
Similar roles pay £60K - 85K a year · our estimate
The whole posting in a few lines. Sign up to read it here and on every role you open.
Sign Up to ReadSVP Product Manager-Clearing Modernisation -Services
As an SVP Product Manager for Payments Clearing Modernization, you will lead the rollout of a strategic payments product processor and serve as the company's subject matter expert on SWIFT CBPR+ payments. You will partner with senior business leaders and a global user community to define and deliver clearing solutions across major market infrastructures, including Fedwire, CHIPS, TARGET2, EURO1, CHAPS, and SIC. This role offers the opportunity to shape the future of cross-border, ISO 20022 payments while driving large-scale transformation within the company's global payments organization.
Part of the week in the office
Company hidden
Office in London, United Kingdom
Still hiring, not crowded yet, and you'd be among the first.
Still hiring?
11 checksActively hiring
In its favour3
How crowded?
5 checksLow
In its favour3
How well does this role fit you?
Answer a few questions or drop your CV, and every role gets a fit score with the reasons, this one first.
Something wrong with this vacancy?