Still hiring?
14 checks1 red flag
Browse
All Tech JobsThe whole board, newest first.Roles That Fit MeAnswer a few questions, see your matches.Early WindowFound before the big boards.Direct ApplyStraight to the manager, past the ATS.By specialty
Your materials
CV AnalyzerWhat an ATS sees, and what to fix.Tailor CVBrought in line with one posting.Cover LetterWritten from your CV and the role.You and the process
Hey, I’m Wayjo. I find roles before the big boards.
Free to browse. An account unlocks the rest.
Jobs
All Tech JobsThe whole board, newest first.Roles That Fit MeAnswer a few questions, see your matches.Early WindowFound before the big boards.Direct ApplyStraight to the manager, past the ATS.$135,200/ year
The whole posting in a few lines. Sign up to read it here and on every role you open.
Sign Up to ReadThe company is running a paid study on the coding environments and programming tasks used to benchmark AI agents. Evaluation harnesses are built so that models are tested against realistic software engineering scenarios, and the results help agents handle complex coding goals.
The session is remote. You will go through a set of coding tasks and their evaluation harnesses and judge whether the problems match real-world software engineering work. You will check the logic, test cases and overall structure of the environments. Your feedback is collected through a guided conversation and screen sharing.
The study is aimed at practicing software engineers who have built and tested complex systems. Candidates should have direct experience writing test suites, evaluation harnesses or thorough code reviews. Backend engineers, full-stack developers, machine learning engineers and software architects are all welcome.
Pay is $65 per hour
The session is remote
Fully remote
Worth a look before you spend an evening tailoring a CV for it.
Still hiring?
14 checks1 red flag
How crowded?
7 checks1 red flag
How well does this role fit you?
Answer a few questions or drop your CV, and every role gets a fit score with the reasons, this one first.
Something wrong with this vacancy?
Salary by agreement