Still hiring?
13 checksNo red flags
Browse
All Tech JobsThe whole board, newest first.Roles That Fit MeAnswer a few questions, see your matches.Early WindowFound before the big boards.Direct ApplyStraight to the manager, past the ATS.By specialty
Your materials
CV AnalyzerWhat an ATS sees, and what to fix.Tailor CVBrought in line with one posting.Cover LetterWritten from your CV and the role.You and the process
Hey, I’m Wayjo. I find roles before the big boards.
Free to browse. An account unlocks the rest.
Jobs
All Tech JobsThe whole board, newest first.Roles That Fit MeAnswer a few questions, see your matches.Early WindowFound before the big boards.Direct ApplyStraight to the manager, past the ATS.Not stated
Similar roles pay $125K - 195K a year · our estimate
The whole posting in a few lines. Sign up to read it here and on every role you open.
Sign Up to ReadThe company supports DoD and other intelligence agencies worldwide, building national security systems that serve warfighters, DoD leadership and the country.
The team needs a senior platform engineer and architect to handle platform engineering, Tier 3 technical support and infrastructure architecture for the DFAS Common Computing Environment (CCE) SIPRNet classified enclave. The work centres on building secure IT solutions, managing infrastructure changes, supporting storage architecture and keeping the environment compliant with DoD technical and security requirements.
You must hold an active Top Secret security clearance and be a United States citizen to be considered.
Equal employment opportunity applies. All employment decisions follow applicable federal, state and local law, and the company does not use AI tools in hiring decisions.
Federal IT Consulting (FEDITC)
Also hiring in San Antonio, United States
1 of their 23 open roles is remote
We've checked whether it's still hiring and how crowded it is.
Still hiring?
13 checksNo red flags
How crowded?
6 checksNo red flags
How well does this role fit you?
Answer a few questions or drop your CV, and every role gets a fit score with the reasons, this one first.
Something wrong with this vacancy?