Still hiring?
13 checks1 red flag
Browse
All Tech JobsThe whole board, newest first.Roles That Fit MeAnswer a few questions, see your matches.Early WindowFound before the big boards.Direct ApplyStraight to the manager, past the ATS.By specialty
Your materials
CV AnalyzerWhat an ATS sees, and what to fix.Tailor CVBrought in line with one posting.Cover LetterWritten from your CV and the role.You and the process
Hey, I’m Wayjo. I find roles before the big boards.
Free to browse. An account unlocks the rest.
Jobs
All Tech JobsThe whole board, newest first.Roles That Fit MeAnswer a few questions, see your matches.Early WindowFound before the big boards.Direct ApplyStraight to the manager, past the ATS.Not stated
The whole posting in a few lines. Sign up to read it here and on every role you open.
Sign Up to ReadThe company is a global partner for AI-first digital transformation and engineering, with about 5,000 people across 16 countries and more than 25 years in the field.
The CEE team of nearly 1,000 builds modern applications, data platforms and AI solutions for large clients in sectors such as banking, telecoms, logistics and retail, using AWS, Azure, GCP, Databricks and Snowflake.
The company works in artificial intelligence, data and cloud, intelligent automation and digital products, and pairs engineering depth with a consulting approach and a focus on learning and sharing knowledge.
The role is for a senior iOS developer working remotely.
Work remotely from the European Union. A work permit is required.
The hiring process runs as follows: CV review, HR call, interview, client interview, then decision.
Equal opportunity applies.
Fully remote
No visa sponsorship
Poland and Central-Eastern Europe
Also hiring in Bulgaria, Poland, Romania and 5 more places
6 of their 51 open roles are remote
Worth a look before you spend an evening tailoring a CV for it.
Still hiring?
13 checks1 red flag
How crowded?
6 checks2 red flags
How well does this role fit you?
Answer a few questions or drop your CV, and every role gets a fit score with the reasons, this one first.
Something wrong with this vacancy?