Still hiring?
13 checks1 red flag
Browse
All Tech JobsThe whole board, newest first.Roles That Fit MeAnswer a few questions, see your matches.Early WindowFound before the big boards.Direct ApplyStraight to the manager, past the ATS.By specialty
Your materials
CV AnalyzerWhat an ATS sees, and what to fix.Tailor CVBrought in line with one posting.Cover LetterWritten from your CV and the role.You and the process
Hey, I’m Wayjo. I find roles before the big boards.
Free to browse. An account unlocks the rest.
Jobs
All Tech JobsThe whole board, newest first.Roles That Fit MeAnswer a few questions, see your matches.Early WindowFound before the big boards.Direct ApplyStraight to the manager, past the ATS.Not stated
Similar roles pay €85K - 105K a year · our estimate
The whole posting in a few lines. Sign up to read it here and on every role you open.
Sign Up to ReadJob Details:
Shape the Future of Confidential Computing! Join Intel's elite engineering team to validate TDX (Trusted Domain Extensions) - a breakthrough technology redefining security and virtualization. Work on one of the industry's most complex and impactful products, where functional validation meets deep technical innovation.
Why You'll Love This Role:
High Impact: Ensure the reliability of TDX, a cornerstone of Intel's confidential compute.
Deep Technical Challenge: Validate across the stack-firmware, OS, drivers, middleware, SDKs, and apps.
Code-Driven: Build frameworks, automation, and reference implementations.
Innovation at Scale: Operate at the intersection of security, virtualization, and cloud.
Career Growth: Collaborate with world-class engineers on advanced architectures.
Part of the week in the office
Intel
Office in Gdansk, Poland
Also hiring in Phoenix, United States, United States, Ireland and 3 more places
3 of their 67 open roles are remote
Worth a look before you spend an evening tailoring a CV for it.
Still hiring?
13 checks1 red flag
How crowded?
6 checks2 red flags
How well does this role fit you?
Answer a few questions or drop your CV, and every role gets a fit score with the reasons, this one first.
Something wrong with this vacancy?