You and the process

With a person
Anna, in-house recruiter
9 years hiring engineers
30 minutes with a real recruiter
They read your CV with you, on a call, and say where the offers are being lost.
Didn’t find what you were looking for? Tell us what to build
Company hidden

Member of Technical Staff

  • Office
  • 6+ years

Salary

$275,000 - 315,000/ year

AI summary

For members

The whole posting in a few lines. Sign up to read it here and on every role you open.

Sign Up to Read

Description

At the company, we're building the future of high-performance compute

We firmly believe that the future of AI depends on the unglamorous: rethinking and rebuilding the stack, all the way down. From the hardware underneath it to the compiler targeting it and the cloud running it. Right now those three things fight each other and that friction shows up as a tax on every researcher trying to build something ambitious. We're here to axe that tax and make compute faster, cheaper and more available. When we succeed, compute will be portable enough that "which cloud, which chip" stop being something you worry about.

To achieve this, we are building our Kernel Optimizer, which takes code and finds its fastest possible form for whatever vendor and cluster topology you point it at, automatically, as well as the Model Foundry which manages the runs, makes research easier and moves workloads across clouds and chips as prices and availability ship, instead of leaving you locked into whatever vendor you signed with first.

We're looking for researchers, engineers and organizations who agree with the basic premise: you don't get the next leap in AI without a leap in compute first.

About the Role

We build the fastest GPU compiler in the world. Most compilers have to preserve correctness at every transform, constraining how far they can search, while we prove correctness at the end instead, allowing us to search a far wider space, with agents, with RL, with anything that works and still guarantee the result. It's why we hold 1 on NVIDIA's own kernel benchmark across hundreds of production kernels.

We're hiring a Member of Technical Staff for AI-Driven Compilation to own the search itself. Proving correctness at the end is what makes the search legal and your job is to make it good.

You'll be building the agentic and RL systems that decide which programs are worth trying (instruction selection, scheduling, barriers and stall counts, tiling, fusion, phase ordering) over a space that is enormous precisely because nothing in it has to be conservative.

The reward signal here is unusually clean for RL: measure wall-clock on real silicon gated by a formal proof. No proxy metrics, no reward hacking that survives contact with the verifier. The system already does things worth seeing. Given only a naive attention spec, the search found FlashAttention v4-level performance on a B300 in about 25 minutes, but it also generalizes. The same loop runs on AMD, TPU and Trainium as well as targets we'd never seen before, such as Apple Silicon.

You'll have access to better tooling than anywhere else because we own the stack all the way down to the ISA, allowing us to create kernels that others can't even express. For example, our custom LLVM backend emits cubins directly, without ptxas, letting us work on instruction selection, scheduling, register allocation and stall counts. Our team understands the hardware better than anyone else, to this extent we've built a bit-exact software model of Blackwell's tcgen05 (the company's site).

The kernels you create will ship immediately on runs such as pre-training AlphaFold v3 at 3.4× the throughput, post-training robotics models on Trainium or running our custom RL rollout engine on TPU at multi-100B parameter scale.

Responsibilities

  • You'll design and implement RL systems that search over a massive program space: instruction selection, schedules, tile sizes, fusion strategies and phase ordering
  • You'll build agentic compilation loops that use LLMs to reason about IR, propose transformations and learn from measured results
  • You'll design the search and credit-assignment machinery around an exact reward built from measured latency on real hardware and a formal correctness proof
  • You'll create representations and embeddings of compiler IR that hold up under learned optimization
  • You'll build the training infrastructure for compiler optimization agents, including rollout throughput and distributed evaluation on real silicon
  • You'll push transfer and cold-start performance so that the search works on unfamiliar targets and new ISAs from the first trial
  • You'll close the loop with production workloads so that the compiler keeps improving from what customers actually run
  • You'll work directly with our compiler and kernel engineers to land learned components in the shipping pipeline
  • You'll run rigorous experiments, dig into the results, iterate on them and publish or open-source some of them

Requirements

  • Someone with a strong background in reinforcement learning with hands-on experience training agents
  • Someone with experience building LLM agents, tool use and other agentic systems
  • Someone with familiarity in GPU programming concepts and a willingness to get down to the ISA
  • Someone proficient in PyTorch or JAX
  • Someone with the ability to design and run experiments that produce trustworthy results
  • Someone with experience in ML compiler stacks (XLA, TVM, Triton, MLIR) or LLVM backends
  • Someone with a background in program synthesis, superoptimization, combinatorial search, formal methods, SMT solvers or verified compilation
  • Someone familiar with RLHF, reward modeling or preference learning
  • Someone with research contributions in RL or learned optimization
  • Someone familiar with GPU performance optimization, profiling and microbenchmarking

Benefits

  • Compiler optimization is the rare place where a learned system gets an enormous action space and a ground-truth reward at the same time. What usually blocks this work is everything around it (a background that can't execute what the search finds or no way to trust the result). You get both here: direct cubin emission below ptxas and a prover that tells you whether the program is correct. In this role, you'll have the tools and researches to let your most ambitious research ideas run wild and if they find valid kernels, ship them into production in days rather than becoming a paper and then nothing.
  • We're a small team operating at frontier scale. We pre-trained foundation models on 4,000 AMD GPUs as a team of three, designed and brought up GB300 NVL72 clusters and designed a TOP500 supercomputer.
  • We believe that hard problems get solved in person and most of our work happens at our office in San Francisco. We offer relocation assistance and, where possible, we'd like you here as often as possible.
  • The base salary range for this full-time position is $275,000-$315,000, plus meaningful equity and benefits.
  • Experience: Any (new grads ok)
  • Visa: US citizen/visa only

Where you’d work

From the office

The office

Relocation offered

No visa sponsorship

About the company

Company hidden

  • Industry: AI

Office in San Francisco, United States

Your chances

Likely still hiring, moderately crowded, and a person reads your message.

  • 20 checks run
  • 7 good signs
  • 5 red flags

Still hiring?

13 checks

Likely active

In its favour4

  • Still on the company's own careers site, checked 1 h agoModerate evidence
  • Specific about the basics: pay, place, level, stack and contract all statedSlight evidence
  • A tight salary range, set for one seat: $275K to $315KSlight evidence
1 moreFewer
  • A hiring contact is attached to itSlight evidence

Against it2

  • Posted 6 weeks ago, older than 95% of the open roles we trackModerate evidence
  • None of the company's 6 open roles was posted in the last 2 weeksModerate evidence

How crowded?

7 checks

Moderate

In its favour3

  • You can message the hiring contact and skip the queueModerate evidence
  • In the office in San Francisco: only people nearby can take itSlight evidence
  • Senior level: far fewer people qualifySlight evidence

Against it3

  • Open for 6 weeks: applications have had time to pile upModerate evidence
  • Offers relocation: people from other countries apply tooSlight evidence
  • Pays more than 86% of similar roles: that draws applicantsSlight evidence
138 roles like this are in their Early WindowFound before the big job boards, while the crowd hasn’t arrived

Fits Me

How well does this role fit you?

Answer a few questions or drop your CV, and every role gets a fit score with the reasons, this one first.

  • Your field
  • Level
  • Stack
  • Work model
  • Salary floor
  • Must-haves
Details14 facts · Role, Location, Compensation, Employment, Company
Tech stack
  • PyTorch
  • LLMs
Seniority
Staff
Type
Full-time
Equity
Equity offered
Industry
AI
Region
United States
Show 8 more factsShow less

Role

Category
Development
Seniority
Staff
Experience
6+ years
Tech stack
  • PyTorch
  • LLMs

Location

Work model
Office
Region
United States
Office
  • San Francisco, United States
Relocation
Offered
Visa sponsorship
Not sponsored

Compensation

Salary
$275,000 - 315,000 / year
Pay period
Annual
Equity
Equity offered

Employment

Type
Full-time

Company

Industry
AI

Something wrong with this vacancy?

Similar vacancies

  • Early Window: Be the first to open itNo views yetCloses in
    Company hidden

    Staff Software Engineer

    Salary by agreement

    • Remote · Europe, Portugal
    • Senior
  • Early Window: Be the first to open itNo views yetCloses in
    Company hidden

    Software Engineer Intern

    Salary by agreement

    • Hybrid · Romania, Berlin
    • Junior
  • Early Window: Be the first to open itNo views yetCloses in
    Company hidden

    Senior Software Engineer

    Salary by agreement

    • Remote
    • Senior
  • Early Window: Be the first to open itNo views yetCloses in
    Company hidden

    Software Engineer

    Salary by agreement

    • Hybrid · Toronto
    • Junior

Share this vacancy

What's wrong with it?

The employer never sees who reported.

Reason